NEWS
On December 6, XI Annual ceremony of summing up the results of the project "The National Rating of Procurement transparency of 2017" was held. Within the framework of the event, the leaders of the transparency rating of procurement in sections of state, regional, municipal, and corporate customers were awarded.
On December 7, a meeting of the Public Council of the State Committee of the Republic of Tatarstan on procurement in an updated format was held. During the meeting, the Regulations on the Public Council were revised in a new edition. The chairman of the Public Council is a member of the working group of the Public Chamber of the Republic of Tatarstan on housing and communal services, the general director of the Unity Managing Company Khaliullin Radik Khanifovich and the deputy chairman of the Public Council is a member of the Public Chamber of the Republic of Tatarstan, chairman of the Interregional Association for Labor Protection Gabdrakhmanov Fanil Iskhakovich.
The Ministry of Health quoted the values of weighted average prices for disposable plastic items, which are included in the government list. These prices are indicated taking into account the inflation factor and without it. It should be noted that the inflation rate used by the Office managed to change: it decreased from 3.8 to 3.2%. Therefore, in order to calculate the initial (maximum) price of contracts, prices from the fifth column of the table contained in the letter should be used.
According to the government's decision, from this date until July 1, 2018, it is not necessary to send to the specified register:
From January 1, these purchases will also be required to carry out customers under № 223 Federal Law, if:
The customer has the right to purchase any medicines by trade names, since the list of drugs that can be purchased is not approved. At the same time, there must be a need for purchased drugs and for purchasing a trade name for the drug. Such conclusions were cited by Supreme Court of Russian Federation in paragraph 24 of the Judicial Review No. 4 (2017).
Clarification refers to the case where the enterprise is the executor of the state contract and involves third parties as co-executors. As pointed out by the Office, in this situation № 223 Federal law is applied only in the amounts that are necessary for the performance of state contracts.
When an enterprise does not spend money, but receives income in the form of interest on the deposit, the contract can be concluded without compliance with Federal law N 44 and Federal law N 223. This opinion was expressed by the Ministry of Finance.
A participant can only provide information that will allow him to find an entry in the register of contracts. Federal law No. 44 does not oblige in this case to provide copies of any documents, nor does it establish requirements for the form of information on the availability of data in the register of contracts.
The Finance Ministry explained that anti-dumping measures are not applied if an electronic auction is held at the price of a unit of goods, work or service.