NEWS

Refusal of the customer to terminate the contract by agreement of the parties is lawful because the price of the delivered goods sharply grew because of rate fluctuation of currencies. The court came to such conclusion.

The customer has the right to consider purchases at the only supplier, counting cumulative annual cost the volume of the contracts signed with subjects of small and average business (SMSP), when purchasing under the Law N 223-FL.

The court recognized lawful actions of the customer who signed the contract according to the Law N 223-FL before expired appeal term in antimonopoly authority of results of purchase.

Actions of the customer who allowed the person who specified the wrong data on a purchase subject in the file attached to the demand to participation in auction aren't recognized as violation of the law N 44-FL .

It is necessary to carry those terms of the contract which are specified in Art. 34 of the Law №44-FL to the essential (about responsibility of the customer and supplier for non-execution of obligations, etc.).

The agreement between Federation of labor unions of RT, Coordination council of associations of employers of RT, the Cabinet of RT on minimum wage in the Republic of Tatarstan was concluded on October 2, 2015 (further - the Agreement) in the Republic of Tatarstan on the basis of Art. 133.1 of the Labour code of the Russian Federation.

The participant has the right to use such way of ensuring performance of the contract and demand if it is provided in the provision on purchase and documentation.

FAS considered that the customer who specified the incorrect postal index in the notice, broke the Law N 44-FL.

The court refused to the participant return of the payment listed to bank for delivery of a guarantee. Earlier the customer refused to accept this guarantee because it doesn't correspond to the Law N 44-FL.