It is impossible to refuse the admission to participation because of a mistake in the optional document of the demand

The participant expressed consent to rendering the services called in documentation (garbage removal), and in the document attached to the demand - on rendering other services (ventilation work check) in the first part of the demand on an electronic platform.

The court considered that the mistake in the attached file can't be the basis for refusal in the admission as submission of such document wasn't provided. In this case the consent reflected in the demand in an electronic platform is important. In this regard the court cancelled the decision of antimonopoly authority which considered actions of the customer breaking the Law N 44-FL.

Document: The resolution of Arbitration court of Ural federal district of 05.10.2015 N F09-6677/15 in the matter of N A71-15377/2014