NEWS

Speech in the document goes about the application of bodies of state (municipal) financial control of the General requirements to carrying out of checks of observance of the Law № 44-FZ (hereinafter – General requirements).
 

On September 26, a meeting of the Public Council under the state procurement Committee of the Republic of Tatarstan was held.
 

In accordance with the decree of the Government of the Russian Federation,banking support of state contracts from the specified date will be carried out, including if foreign sanctions apply to suppliers (contractors, performers).
 

26.09.2018 at 14.00 h. at the address: Kazan, St. Petersburg, 86 will be held a meeting of the Public Council of the state Committee of the Republic of Tatarstan on procurement.
 

To confirm the powers of the General Director, the state procurement participant submitted the minutes of the General meeting of the company. According to the document, the term of office ended on the day of the announcement of the purchase. The Board rejected the application, deciding that the credentials had not been confirmed on the date of application.
 

The Ministry told about the results of the working group meeting held on August 30 with the participation of representatives of authorized banks and operators of electronic platforms included in the relevant list (order of the Government of the Russian Federation of July 12, 2018 № 1447-p). Thus, it was confirmed the existence of cooperation agreements between all these operators of electronic platforms and banks.
 

In its letter, the Treasury of Russia reported on the need to provide participants of the contract system in the field of procurement, except for procurement participants, with certificates and electronic signatures from January 1, 2019 in the manner prescribed by the regulations of the certifying center of the Federal Treasury, approved by the order of the Federal Treasury of July 31, 2015 № 197
 

The participant specified in the Declaration as a part of the second part of the application that it meets the requirements of item 3-9 of part 1 of Art. 31 of the Law N 44-FZ. He also gave a more detailed justification on all points, except p. 7, 7.1 of part 1 of article 31 of the Law N 44-FZ. The Commission of the customer rejected the application, considering that the participant has not confirmed its compliance with these points.
 

The road enterprise in the absence of the contract signed with the state customer, performed works on elimination of consequences of the cyclone and on the maintenance of highways. The customer in the payment of the performed works the company refused. In this regard, the contractor appealed to the arbitration court to the customer to recover the cost of the work performed.
 

The company (hereinafter also – the contractor) and the institution (hereinafter – the customer) signed a state contract for the implementation of works on the construction of a kindergarten. The contractor, when signing the contract, was acquainted with the design and estimate documentation and had no comments increasing the contract price and terms of work.