The courts are again reminded of the signs of misuse of crushing the purchase

18 June 2019, Tuesday

The contractor wanted to get paid for their services, but the courts, including the armed forces, he was refused. They decided: the contractor is not entitled to payment, as the state contract between the parties is not concluded.

Indeed, the services surrendered just acts. It would seem that it was possible to regard the situation as a purchase from a single supplier, because the amount for each act did not exceed 100 thousand rubles. However, the courts noted: the documents were drawn up one day, the services provided are identical and related to one event. It has not been proved that the customer could not enter into a contract through competitive procurement.

Document: Definition of the armed forces of 22.05.2009 N 305-ES19-6610