Plans of purchases and plans schedules for the Law N 44-FL need to be placed in EIS in the form of the machine-readable documents signed with a digital signature within three working days from date when they are approved or changed.
In the volume of obligatory purchases at subjects of small and average business (SSAB) making 5% (for 2015) and 10% (for the next years) from the cumulative cost volume of contracts, are offered to include purchases which participants are any persons, including SSAB.
Such agency admits since November 1 FAS. Now the right of antimonopoly service to consider cases on the administrative violations made in the sphere of purchases under the Law N 223-FL is legislatively affirmed.
This rule needs to be considered when forming data on date of performance of the contract which will be entered in the register of contracts. The customer has to specify the term of full performance of obligations the parties including also acceptance and payment of goods (results of the performed work, the rendered service).
The shareholder doesn't carry out purchase for ensuring the state and municipal needs, acquiring shares at other members of society. Such transaction is regulated by the Law on joint-stock companies.
According to provisions of the Law N 223-FL all customers are obliged to publish data on the contracts signed by results of purchases at subjects of small and average business (SMSP) on the official website.
Refusal of the customer to terminate the contract by agreement of the parties is lawful because the price of the delivered goods sharply grew because of rate fluctuation of currencies. The court came to such conclusion.
The customer has the right to consider purchases at the only supplier, counting cumulative annual cost the volume of the contracts signed with subjects of small and average business (SMSP), when purchasing under the Law N 223-FL.
The court recognized lawful actions of the customer who signed the contract according to the Law N 223-FL before expired appeal term in antimonopoly authority of results of purchase.
Actions of the customer who allowed the person who specified the wrong data on a purchase subject in the file attached to the demand to participation in auction aren't recognized as violation of the law N 44-FL .