On the results of the Commission's work under the Chairman of the State Committee of the Republic of Tatarstan for procurement of anti-corruption.
In the Law N 44-FL it isn't provided that descriptions of goods in the first part of the demand and the registration certificate have to coincide.
If the customer uses such criterion of an assessment of demands as experience of carrying out construction works under the state and municipal contracts, the participants executing these contracts have advantage. However experience doesn't depend on that, in public interests works or in the private were carried out.
The individual entering into group can to all established requirements not to correspond. The conclusion concerns purchases under the Law N 223-FL.
Dear customers and suppliers!
Since December 28, 2015 the State committee of the Republic of Tatarstan on purchases locates at the address: 420107, Kazan, Peterburgskaya St., 86. Phone for reference: (843) 212-28-12.
The conclusion of such type of contracts isn't provided in the list of cases when instead of the firm price of the contract its formula and the maximum value are established.
If as one of criterion indicators "business reputation" the customer establishes membership of the participant in the self-regulating organization (SRO), it can be recognized as restriction of number of participants of purchase.
At liquidation of firm of the contractor it is necessary to appeal to court for cancellation of the contract.
When the customer solves, whether to apply anti-dumping measures, under the Law N 44-FL the size of decrease in the initial (maximum) price of the contract (IMPsC) as a percentage isn't rounded to the whole value.
We will apply a conclusion and in a situation when the contract consists with the only supplier. In these cases the contract doesn't may contain also a formula of calculation of the price and its maximum value.