In the Law N 44-FL it isn't provided that descriptions of goods in the first part of the demand and the registration certificate have to coincide.
The court supported the decision of OFAS: the customer who because of different names of goods in the certificate and documentation rejected the demand of the participant, acted illegally. It was noted that offered to delivery and specified in documentation goods have identical characteristics and mission.
Document: The resolution EXPERT of Ural federal district of 13.11.2015 in the matter of No. A76-29222/2014