NEWS

The letter of the Ministry of Labour and Social Protection of the Russian Federation from 3/21/2016 years No. 18-2/10/P-1526 are defined criteria of accountability for corruption offenses, and also the Review of practice of accountability of the public (municipal) servants for non-compliance with restrictions and bans, requirements about prevention or about a settlement of conflicting interests and non-execution of the duties established for corruption counteraction which is prepared on the basis of offers of federal government bodies and the supreme bodies of executive power of subjects of the Russian Federation, and also according to jurisprudence on hearing of cases about accountability for commission of corruption offenses is directed.

The decree of the President of the Russian Federation from 4/1/2016 years No. 147 "About the National plan of counteraction of corruption for 2016 - 2017".

This Decree it is recommended to the highest officials (heads of the supreme executive bodies of the government) of subjects of the Russian Federation and heads of local governments, being guided by National strategy of counteraction of the corruption approved by the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of April 13, 2010 No. 460, and the National plan of counteraction of corruption for 2016 - 2017 to provide introduction till June 1, 2016 into regional anti-corruption programs and anti-corruption programs (plans for corruption counteraction) of public authorities of subjects of the Russian Federation, and also local governments in which such plans are available of the changes directed to achievement of concrete results in work on the prevention of corruption, minimization and (or) mitigation of consequences of corruption offenses and also control over the implementation of the actions provided by these programs (plans).

The cassation has considered that the customers holding a joint competition with limited participation on delivery of food have legally established the additional requirement about experience. At the same time each initial (maximum) price of the contract (NMTsK) didn't exceed 500 thousand rubles.

The superior court has cancelled the interim measures taken by court of the first instance. They were that the customer was forbidden to send information connected with unilateral refusal of the contract to OFAS.

The position of the Ministry of Economic Development is based that the Law N 44-FL doesn't establish a duty of the customer to attach information on their qualification to the protocol of consideration and an assessment of applications of participants of a competition.

Since May 15 the order of Minpromtorg containing a form of the standard contract for rendering services in diagnostics, servicing and repair of vehicles works. The form is applied irrespective of the size of the initial (maximum) price of the contract (NMTsK).

The procurement commission, according to OFAS, has broken the Law N 44-FL, having rejected the application because of lack in her of information on guarantee certificates. The court has supported a position of antimonopoly authority.

Since May 12, 2016 registration of customers and participants of purchases in system of electronic invoices in the sphere of purchases of the Republic of Tatarstan sedogkz.zakupki.tatar (further - SEDO GKZ RT) is carried out independently.

The list of finished goods of mass consumption which purchases don't provide advancing is approved.

Counting the initial (maximum) price of the contract (NMTsK) when purchasing construction works, the customer will have to be guided by budget standards. This conclusion can be drawn, having analysed the project of changes of GRK Russian Federation.