NEWS

The parties concluded a deal for the supply of goods. Obligations were fulfilled at the request of the customer.

Some of the products were delivered and paid for. A month before the end of the contract, the supplier demanded to select the entire volume of products. The customer said that there is no need for it. The counterparty appealed to the court.

The customer purchased medical furniture. The draft contract obligated the supplier to submit, among other things, a copy of the registration certificate. The participant considered the demand illegal and complained to the Office of the Federal Antimonopoly Service.

The parties entered into a construction contract. The supervisory authority warned the contractor that the design documentation had not passed the environmental review and offered to ensure that it passed. The customer asked to stop work. The deal was later terminated by agreement without performance.

The parties agreed on the supply of overalls. The goods have been delivered. The customer accepted it and signed a contract for the examination.

On December 15, 2022, a final meeting was held with republican customers on the topic: "Procurement in accordance with Federal Law No. 44-FZ dated 05.04.2013 "On the contract system in the field of procurement of goods, works, services for state and municipal needs""

On December 2, 2022, the results of the republican competition for the best media coverage of the functioning of the contract system in the field of procurement of goods, works, services for state and municipal needs were summed up. The competition was held in the nomination: "The best material in the media", a total of 4 competitive works were accepted.

Under the terms of the procurement, the collective participants attached to the application an agreement or other document that regulates their interaction. It was supposed to contain the procedure for submitting an application, executing a transaction with a customer and distributing work between persons for each lot as a percentage of the initial maximum price of the contract.

A procurement participant with a ban on the admission of foreign manufactured goods complained that the winner's application was not rejected. He submitted an extract from the register of industrial products for goods with a different code of the all-Russian classifier of products by type of economic activity, which did not match the code in the notice.

Since December 10, a number of regional and municipal customers have been allowed to purchase, among other things, processed and unprocessed timber. We are talking about purchases on demand, including for mobilization.

What should the customer do if the parameters of the goods from the application do not match the data of the manufacturer's website? Should an application be rejected based on the manufacturer's letters? Should the information be considered unreliable if the manufacturer did not give an unambiguous answer about the compatibility of products with the customer's equipment? More in the review.