NEWS

According to the Ministry of Economic Development, the provision of the law N 44-FZ about the customer's duty to refuse unilaterally the contract is applied not only to delivery.

Has drawn such conclusion of the Ministry of Economic Development for cases when within the contract additional agreements are provided, and as a result of its cost I became more than 100 thousand rubles.

The economic board of the Supreme Court has come to such conclusion.

Conclusion follows from the letter of the Ministry of Economic Development. It has specified: in the Law N 44-FZ there are no regulations on an opportunity to provide consistently several bank guarantees.

Department already stated such position. It voiced similar opinion also concerning the Belarusian goods.

So considers the Ministry of Economic Development.
We believe, explanations will be useful if the quoted bid was signed by the representative of the participant, but the power of attorney isn't attached to her.

Such position of the Ministry of Finance was stated in the letter by FTS. The Ministry of Finance expressed similar opinion and earlier, in November, 2015.

According to the Ministry of Economic Development, it is possible if the contract with the unique supplier according to item 23 p.1 is signed by Art. 93 of the Law N 44-FZ. Line item of department not new.

Department specified that in case of merge, accession, transformation the contract of the reorganized legal entity can confirm the corresponding experience of the participant.

Such conclusion follows from the letter of the Ministry of Economic Development. Department already stated a similar position earlier, for example in September, 2016.