NEWS

Since January 5, 2020 the new edition of the order of the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation of December 29, 2014 No. 173n and the Order of formation of information and documents approved by it, and also exchange of information and documents between the customer and Federal Treasury for the purpose of maintaining the register of the contracts signed by customers
 

Specialists of the Ministry of Finance of Russia in pursuance of part 5 of Art. 24.1 of the Federal law of April 5, 2013 № 44-FZ "On the contract system in the procurement of goods, works, services for state and municipal needs" prepared a draft decree of the Government of the Russian Federation on approval of standard application forms:
 

The Ministry of Finance of Russia spoke about the preparation of the necessary for the implementation of the provisions of the Federal law of may 1, 2019 № 71-FZ amendments to the Budget code, as well as regulatory legal acts regulating the following procedures: (formation and submission of the main managers of the Federal budget justification of budget allocations;
 

The Ministry of transport approved standard contracts for regular transportation of passengers and luggage by road and urban land electric transport.
 

The government has made changes to the rules of registration of Bank guarantees in the field of public procurement. The new requirements are due to the fact that from July 1, 2019 the contractor additionally ensures the performance of warranty obligations, if they are in the contract.
 

Create a unified register of Russian electronic products. The customer will be guided by him in the preparation of documentation, and the Commission — in the application of restrictions and conditions of admission to public procurement. Products from the register will receive priority in procurement under the Law N 223-FZ.
 

The customer published the notice and used the link to the documentation in the sections "place of delivery" and "terms of delivery". In both cases, instead of specific information, it was stated: "in accordance with Annex 1 to the contract - the list of buyers, the number of products, the delivery schedule".

The Commission rejected the participant's application, finding information about it in the register of unscrupulous suppliers. The participant appealed to the control body.
 

The Commission of the customer rejected the participant, having referred in the Protocol of consideration that the trademark wasn't specified in the application. The participant complained to Management of Federal Antimonopoly service according to documentation it was necessary to specify not trade, and the trademark.
 

To confirm the experience of construction work, the bidder submitted a set of documents in the application: