NEWS


19
September 2019
Thursday

Purchase participants

It is not always possible to cancel the decision to include in the register of unscrupulous suppliers if the FAS has not caused the case

On September 19, 2019, a meeting of the Public Council under the state procurement Committee of the Republic of Tatarstan was held.
 


18
September 2019
Wednesday

The Ministry has developed a draft of changes in a number of regulations in the field of public procurement. The amendments are mostly technical in nature, but there are also substantive innovations.
 


17
September 2019
Tuesday

The Commission rejected the bidder's application due to non-compliance with the documentation requirements. She considered the following:
 


16
September 2019
Monday

The draft defines how the initial maximum contract price and the contract price with a single supplier will be calculated for the purchase of motor fuel, including automobile and aviation gasoline.


13
September 2019
Friday

The Ministry of sport proposed to revise the limit values of the significance of the criteria for evaluating applications for the purchase of sports equipment and inventory. If the changes are approved, the cost criteria will be not less than 40%, and the non-cost criteria-not more than 60%.
 


12
September 2019
Thursday

FAS Russia told how long to recognize the winner evaded the contract, how to provide a certificate of origin to participate in the purchase, whether it is possible to replace the country of origin of the goods in the performance of the state contract.
 



10
September 2019
Tuesday

The Agency again spoke about the illegality of the assignment under the state contract. It recalled that legal relations in public procurement are regulated not only by civil, but also by budget legislation and the legislation on the contract system.
 


9
September 2019
Monday

After the termination of the state contract, the customer entered into contracts for additional delivery with another organization. Under the new conditions, the cost per unit of goods was higher (27.5 rubles instead of 16.6 rubles). The customer demanded to recover the difference from the supplier under the terminated contract.
 


SUBSCRIBE FOR NEWS
All content on this site is licensed under
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International