The Agency plans to approve a standard contract to replace the current one.
Among other things, the FAS specified: what should the customer do if the types of work from the unified state register do not correspond to the object of purchase, what to pay attention to when choosing the purchase method, what requirements of the customer will burden the participants. Read more about this in our review.
11 decisions of the district courts adopted in October were selected. They relate to issues that are common to all customers, as well as individual types of purchases — construction works, medical equipment maintenance, real estate purchases, and vouchers for children.
How to correctly set the amount of contract enforcement for SMP and SONKO, whether to place the conclusion of the state expert examination of project documentation in the EIS, whether it is possible to place part of the documentation outside the EIS-answers to these and other questions in our review.
On November 30, amendments to the standard contract for the supply of technical equipment for the rehabilitation of disabled people come into force. Customers are required to apply them after 30 calendar days after placement in the EIS. They're not there yet.
Amendments to Law No. 223-FZ passed the second reading. Change the procedural aspects of competitive e-procurement among MSPS. They also want to fix the list of information that the customer has the right to demand from the participant.
The winner of the purchase did not sign the contract on time. The customer recognized it as evaded and sent the information for inclusion in the RNP.
The Supervisory authority found that the winner also failed to provide security for the performance of the contract: data on the Bank guarantee, in its opinion, was not in the register. Information about the winner was included in the RNP.
The government has corrected some acts on public procurement and procurement under Law No. 223-FZ. The changes relate, among other things, to the rules for forming a purchase plan and schedule, the register of contracts and the register of contracts, and the report on purchases from SMPS. Let's talk about the main innovations.
The customer refused to perform the contract with the company and applied to the Antimonopoly authority to include information about it in the RNP.
The proceedings were suspended several times: first, the supervisors waited for the court's decision on the legality of the unilateral termination of the contract to come into force, and then — when they would consider the company's appeal against this decision. Therefore, the information in the RNP was included only after 2 years.
The Cabinet of Ministers approved amendments to several documents used by state customers under Law No. 223-FZ.