Courts: the control body must include information about the contractor under the state contract in the RNP on time.
The customer refused to perform the contract with the company and applied to the Antimonopoly authority to include information about it in the RNP.
The proceedings were suspended several times: first, the supervisors waited for the court's decision on the legality of the unilateral termination of the contract to come into force, and then — when they would consider the company's appeal against this decision. Therefore, the information in the RNP was included only after 2 years.
The society did not agree with this. The courts supported it:
the Supervisory authority should not suspend the proceedings in the case of appeal against the unilateral refusal to perform the contract in court;
the law sets deadlines for sending information and including it in the RNP. This should be done in a timely manner, and not in an arbitrary period;
entering data into the RNP after two years from the moment when the supervisors have such a duty violates the rights and interests of the company.
Document:Resolution of the AC of the Volga-Vyatka district of 12.10.2020 on the case N A11-11058/2019