NEWS

The parties have signed a contract for the supply and installation of equipment. According to its terms, the customer must prepare the premises in order to mount the goods. The supplier sent him the technical conditions for placing the equipment in accordance with the operational documentation.
The supplier wanted to fulfill the obligations on time, but the premises were not prepared. This was done only a few months later. Since the goods were not accepted on time, they had to be stored in a special warehouse. The supplier demanded, in particular, to reimburse these costs.
The customer refused to pay: the supplier changed the technical conditions several times. The initial data is initially unreliable. The losses were caused by his fault.

The participant complained that the customer did not apply the national mode when purchasing PPE. He chose the wrong product code according to OKPD 2 in order not to establish a ban on the admission of foreign products: in the notification he included the code 32.99.11.120 for non-medical respirators. In the description of the same product, he indicated that he was purchasing a medical filter respirator for single use. So, we need the code 32.50.50.190 for medical masks with a ban on admission.
The customer explained that he bought respirators, not masks. He confirmed this with registration certificates for medical devices. They contain the code 32.99.11.120. It is not necessary to establish a ban on admission in this case.

The customer decided to terminate the contract unilaterally and sent information about the supplier to the FAS to be included in the RNP. The supervisors decided not to do this: there is no evidence of a significant violation of the terms of the contract. Unilateral refusal is illegal.
To protect the interests of the antimonopoly authority, the supplier hired a representative. Since no grounds were found for unilateral refusal, the supplier incurred unreasonable expenses for legal aid services. He demanded that the customer reimburse them. He did not pay.

According to the changes made to the form of an extract from a contract containing information constituting a state secret (Appendix No. 1 to the Order of the Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation No. 502 dated August 31, 2015), column 2 of the specified extract, when filled in, indicates, among other things, the number of a separate account of the customer (buyer) (Order of the Minister of Defense of the Russian Federation dated August 13, 2021 No. 488 (reg. in the Ministry of Justice on September 28, 2021).

When purchasing a number of foreign radio electronics with a ban on admission, it is impossible to use additional characteristics outside of the KTRU in the description of the object of purchase. This rule applies if the purchase has established

The Ministry of Finance proposed to bring in line with the optimization edits the requirements for banks that issue security guarantees.

In particular, the letter prepared by the Ministry's specialists notes that according to sub-paragraphs "e" and "h" of paragraph 2 of the Rules for Maintaining the Register of contracts concluded by customers, the register of contracts includes, among other things, information on the term of the contract (a separate stage of contract execution) and a document on acceptance (in case of a decision on acceptance of the delivered goods, work performed, services rendered). And in accordance with p . 22 Of the Procedure for the formation of information, as well as the exchange of information and documents between the customer and the Federal Treasury for the purpose of maintaining the register of contracts (hereinafter referred to as Procedure No. 11Zn) when forming information about the term of execution of the contract (a separate stage of contract execution), the end date of the contract execution, the end date of the contract stage (if any) are also indicated in the register.

The department noted that purchases of radio electronics from the list without restrictions on the admission of foreign products are possible only in exceptional cases and with a permit.

The customer established the availability of certificates of voluntary certification systems as one of the criteria for evaluating applications. The Tver OFAS considered that this requirement was excessive. It does not improve the quality of the product and leads to restriction of competition.

On October 6-9, 2021, the Republic of Crimea hosted the II All-Russian conference on public procurement "State order on the banks of Taurida".