NEWS

The parties signed a contract for the work. According to him, the result must be submitted by December 20. We did it almost a year later.
The customer has accrued penalties since December 20: in his opinion, the preposition "before" means the end of the term on December 19. The contractor did not pay them. The customer appealed to the court.
The courts supported him, but corrected the calculation of the penalty, because:
the deadline for the completion of works is until December 20. So, the delay could not have occurred earlier than December 21;

Since the beginning of March, a decree has been in effect on the non-placement of information on certain purchases in the EIS, namely:
customers under sanctions and (or) restrictions (including credit organizations);
credit institutions, if such measures have been introduced against the persons who control them.
The Ministry of Finance, among other things, clarified that in other cases these rules are not used. For example, when purchasing by a subsidiary, if the shares in its authorized capital belong to the customer under sanctions and this customer is not a credit institution.
There is no list of customers against whom restrictive measures have been established. Innovations are applied:

The contractor completed the design work, but did not receive the conclusion of the state expert examination, because its cost has risen significantly: due to additional work, the result was handed over after the prices were changed. The Company asked the customer to increase the contract price and extend the term.
The customer did not do this and terminated the transaction unilaterally. Among other things , he explained: according to the terms of the contract, it is necessary to obtain a positive expert opinion, without it, the works have no consumer value. The contractor appealed to the court.
The court refused. The appeal and cassation supported the contractor and collected the main debt minus the examination, the fee for the services of a representative, because:
the absence of a positive conclusion does not mean that you do not have to pay for the work actually performed. Their result has value for the customer. He can use it when signing a contract with another contractor;

Anti-crisis measures - 2022 Law No. 44-FZ Contract (44-FZ) Sole Supplier
On April 20, amendments were adopted in the first reading, including to Law No. 44-FZ.
Now it is possible to purchase medicines, medical products and consumables in a non-competitive way according to clause 5.1 of Part 1 of Article 93 of Law No. 44-FZ, subject to a number of conditions. State or municipal medical organizations have such an opportunity.
The government, in particular, offered to allow other customers to purchase on the specified basis. Medical products and consumables can be purchased according to the rules of the "electronic store".

The list N 1 will include, in particular:
03.22.20 — fresh or chilled freshwater fish (fish farming products);
10.13.15.110 — canned meat;
10.86.10.133 — adapted milk mixtures (female milk substitutes), including initial, dry for young children;
16.21.12.110 — plywood;
17.23.12.130 — boxes, bags, cases, postal sets made of paper or cardboard with paper stationery;
23.19.23.110 — glassware for laboratory purposes;
26.52.1 — watches of all types, except for clock mechanisms and parts;
58.29.32.000 — download application software;
62.01.2 — originals of the software.

If during the execution of the construction contract circumstances arise due to which it cannot be executed, then in 2022, among other things, you can change

The company performed the work in the hospital under a verbal agreement with the customer due to the urgent need due to the tense epidemiological situation in the region. The customer refused to sign the acceptance certificates, did not pay for the work in full. Among other things, he explained: there was no need for work, legal relations could not arise without a competitive procedure.

Amendments were signed on measures to support customers and procurement participants in connection with sanctions. In particular, they limited the terms of payment for contracts, clarified the rules for describing the subject of procurement, secured the opportunity to purchase work on the construction of an object on a turnkey basis.

The changes were introduced by Federal Law No. 104-FZ of April 16, 2022

The parties entered into a contract for security services. The customer terminated it unilaterally due to improper performance. The controllers included the information in the RNP.