The decree was signed by the Chairman of the Government of the Russian Federation.
Loans under the new program will be issued for three years — from 2022 to 2025.
The loan can be taken out for a maximum of 10 years.
The controllers were complained that the EP operator did not check whether the company's documents meet additional requirements. There was no acceptance certificate, but the operator placed the documents in the register of accredited participants. The application was rejected.
Since August 10, information about suppliers (contractors, performers) is not included in the RNP if they have not fulfilled their obligations under contracts due to force majeure. We are talking, among other things, about foreign sanctions. However, these persons were not relieved of responsibility for refusing to fulfill the contract due to sanctions against the customer.
In a purchase with a ban on the admission of foreign manufactured goods, one of the applications was rejected. The customer did this because he saw a different code in the product registry entry
OKPD 2 — it did not match the code in the notification. The participant did not specify the registration numbers of the products needed by the customer.
Since July 1, a number of mandatory requirements for a security guarantee for electronic competitive procurement from MSPs have been in effect under Law No. 223-FZ. For example, the customer will accept it from the same guarantors as under Law No. 44-FZ.
The bidder's application for catering was rejected for non-compliance with the additional requirements: the price of the confirming contract was less than 20% of the NMCC.
The participant considered it illegal, since he submitted 2 contracts, which in total exceeded the established minimum.
When purchasing with offset contracts, the participants will confirm by choice
The customer purchased drugs from the list of VED and established admission restrictions. The participant's application was rejected — he did not confirm the country of origin of the goods.
The winner was deemed to have evaded because he did not sign the contract. Controllers did not include information in the RNP.
The participant's application was rejected because, contrary to the terms of the purchase, the furniture trademarks were not indicated in it.