NEWS
The customer refused to enter into a contract with the winner because he presented an inappropriate bank guarantee. He formalized his decision in a protocol.
The list of prohibited foreign goods is planned to be supplemented, in particular, with the following items:
28.22.16.111 - passenger elevators;
28.25.12.110 - industrial air conditioners;
28.25.12.120 - air conditioners for vehicles;
28.25.20.110 - general purpose fans.
The department determined how the state customer will calculate the NMCC, the price of a contract with a single supplier, the initial price of a unit of goods (work, services) when purchasing medical products. There are some exceptions. The new rules will take effect on August 31st.
The organization has entered into an agreement for the provision of consulting services with FSUE. The customer has repeatedly signed the acceptance certificates without comment, but paid for them only partially.
On September 21-24, 2020, the Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Tatarstan, with the support of the Government of the Russian Federation, is holding the international forum Kazan Digital Week - 2020.
The customer sent the winner of the purchase a draft state contract. He did not sign it in the appointed time, so the customer appealed to the control body with a statement on the recognition of the winner evaded the contract. The Moscow FAS included the violator in the register of unfair suppliers.
Under the terms of the contract, the contractor had to develop design and estimate documentation for major repairs of the post office. He completed the work and, without receiving payment, went to court.
From August 30 to September 10, 2020, on the day of the Republic of Tatarstan day, the launch of the intellectual business space "100% Tatarstan"will take place.
The Agency explained how to ensure the return of the advance payment under the state contract, how and in what case it is possible to extend the payment period under the contract, if such a need is related to the coronavirus.
The customer established in the documentation for the procurement of legal services the requirement for the obligatory presence of the contractor at the place of his location on working days (in accordance with the internal labor regulations). The entrepreneur considered this requirement unlawful.