NEWS

Justification in unified information system inability to comply with the prohibition or restriction on the admission of goods from foreign countries is planned to be necessary.

This conclusion follows from the letter of Ministry of Economic Development of Russia, which stated that the issue of changing the provision of contracts concluded before 31 of December 2013, should be resolved in accordance with the Federal Law of 21.07.2005 N 94-FL.

Procurement Plan of innovation, high-tech products and medicines must be placed, even if it is empty. Such a situation may arise, for example, when the volume of purchases does not exceed 100 thousand rubles (500 thousand rubles with an annual revenue of more than 5 billion rubles.). 

July 7, 2015 held a free training session on procurement for small businesses, organizations of disabled persons, socially-oriented non-profit organizations and national commodity producers, organized SUE RT «Procurement Development Centre of the Republic of Tatarstan» with the support of the State procurement Committee of the Republic of Tatarstan.

Reducing permissible if the prices of medicines in the draft contract which is located winner in the unified information system does not correspond to the maximum selling price.

This change, after which the customer ceases to be covered by the Federal Law dated 05.04.2013 N 44-FL and the Federal Law of 18.07.2011 N 223-FL, can not affect the already announced purchase. They must be completed in accordance with the norms of the law under which commenced.

The customer is not entitled to violate the terms of the contract, even if after the results of the procurement chief administrator of budgetary funds withdraw from the account of the customer limits of budgetary obligations, distributed prior to the adoption of the budget law.

This obligation of the customer is retained even if the contract does not provide for its gradual execution, but delivery and payment are made regularly.

Ministry of Economic Development of Russian Federation also noted that in this case the inclusion of information on the supplier (contractor, executor) in Register of unfair suppliers because of non-fulfillment of the contract can only limit its subsequent participation in the procurement if the customer has established the requirement of the absence of information about the participant in the registry.