NEWS

The Supreme Court issued a review of the practice, in which it explained: in what cases the contractor will be paid for work performed without an agreement, when the control body has the right to apply state enforcement measures, what should the winner do with the contract, the conclusion of which is suspended.

From September 1, construction purchases are excluded from the mandatory auction list. From that date, customers will be able to conduct them both through an auction and through a competition. Amendments on the specifics of the construction tender have already been approved by the Federation Council.

What to do with the contract if due to the pandemic it is no longer necessary, can I participate in the Commission meeting remotely, when it is impossible to deliver an improved product even with the consent of the customer, can I pay a penalty at the expense of a Bank guarantee?

Amendments to Laws No. 44-FZ and 223-FZ concern the fulfillment of the mandatory share of purchases of domestic goods, including those supplied when performing work, rendering services. In addition, the texts of the documents were supplemented with new provisions. 

The organization has applied for participation in 3 auctions. They were rejected for the second part: documents confirming the participant's compliance with additional requirements were not provided. For the third application, the platform did not unblock the funds deposited as collateral.

A participant in a construction procurement with additional requirements complained that his application was rejected improperly. It did not include a copy of the commissioning permit.

On may 1, updated bans and restrictions on the admission of foreign goods to public procurement came into force. However, in practice, there are questions about their application. The Ministry of industry and trade explained in which cases the ban on the admission of foreign goods does not apply to purchases and how to apply the "third extra"mechanism.

On July 27, the order of the Ministry of industry and trade comes into force, which approved 3 updated forms of standard contracts

The procurement participant submitted as part of the application a copy of the minutes of the general meeting, from which it followed: the maximum amount of one transaction concluded as a result of the electronic auction should not exceed 500 million rubles. The copy has not been notarized. There were no documents in the application that would establish another way of approving a major transaction for this organization. The Commission considered that the transaction was large for the participant, since he included an approval document in the application. The application was rejected because the approval decision was inadequate.

The customer made a purchase of liquid for inhalation. The vials had to be compatible with existing equipment. The participant offered the product, as well as an additional adapter for equipment. His application was rejected for inconsistency of information. The participant considered this illegal and complained to the Antimonopoly authority.