Business trip and vacation do not remove responsibility for missing the deadline for signing the state contract or one of the ways to get into the RNP
The Limited Liability Company (LLC) did not manage to sign the contract on time. The reasons were the business trip of the head and the accountant's vacation, while the bank considered the request for an independent guarantee as collateral for a long time.
The courts, having examined the applicant's relevant objections, reasonably concluded that the reasons given by LLC could not be considered valid.:
- the business trip of the head and the vacation of the accountant are internal organizational measures of the legal entity;
- the arguments that the LLC wanted to conclude a deal and performed actions for this purpose in the form of obtaining an independent guarantee have been rejected. The LLC took up the issue of agreeing the terms and size with the bank on the day when the contract was due to be signed. The money for the production of the guarantee was paid after this period expired. LLC chose this type of security itself, knowing that issuing a warranty can be time-consuming.;
- controversial reasons cannot be considered valid. This is not force majeure. Participation in the purchase and submission of the application carry the risk of consequences for the winner if he does not conclude the contract.
These reasons cannot serve as a reason for not including information about the company in the register of unscrupulous suppliers.