It is explained in which cases the customer is obliged to make a decision on unilateral cancellation of the contract
22 January 2025, Wednesday
In a letter prepared by representatives of the antimonopoly authority, it is explained that if, during the execution of the contract, it is established that the procurement participant has ceased to comply with the requirements of art. 31 of Law No. 44-FZ (with the exception of the requirement not to include information about him in the RNP) or has provided false information about his compliance with these requirements, the customer is obliged to make a decision on unilateral refusal from the execution of the contract, as well as send an appropriate request for the inclusion of information about the counterparty in the RNP.
Recall that by virtue of Part 15 of Article 95 of Law No. 44-FZ, the customer is obliged to make a decision on unilateral cancellation of the contract, even if this was not provided for in the contract, in the following cases:
- if, during the execution of the contract, it is established that the counterparty and the delivered goods no longer meet the requirements established by the notification for the participants in the purchase and the delivered goods.;
- if, during the execution of the contract, it is established that, when determining the counterparty, the latter provided false information about its compliance and the compliance of the delivered goods with the requirements specified in the notification.;
- if, as a result of the reorganization of the contractor (contractor), his rights and obligations under the contract have passed to a newly formed legal entity registered in the territory of a foreign state, in respect of which a ban, restriction, or advantage has been established for the procurement of works, services, respectively performed or provided by foreign persons, and the contractor (contractor) was a Russian person;
- if, during the execution of a contract concluded in accordance with clause 47, Part 1, Article 93 of Law No. 44-FZ for the supply of goods, the production of which has been established or modernized and mastered on the territory of the Russian Federation in accordance with a special investment contract, such contract is terminated;
– if, during the execution of the contract concluded in accordance with clause 48, Part 1, Article 93 of Law No. 44-FZ, the contract with counter-investment obligations concluded in accordance with Article 111.4 of Law No. 44-FZ is terminated.
Document: Letter from the Federal Antimonopoly Service of Russia dated January 9, 2025 No. 28/289/25
On March 24, 2026, Arsk will host zonal seminars and meetings organized by the State Procurement Committee of the Republic of Tatarstan in cooperation with the Procurement Development Center of the Republic of Tatarstan JSC. Events for customers and suppliers will focus on effective participation in procurement, changes and practical aspects of the application of 44-FZ.
From March 1, 2026, amendments to the rules for the application of the national regime for software procurement under Laws No. 44-FZ and No. 223-FZ will come into force.
Specialists of the State Committee participated in a seminar organized by the Educational and Methodological Center of the Federal Antimonopoly Service of Russia in Kazan. The event is dedicated to the topic of the national procurement regime under 44-FZ from January 1, 2026.
The agency explained that according to the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation No. 19, the supply of motor fuel refers to cases when the contract must necessarily contain a price formula and its maximum value.
SUBSCRIBE FOR NEWS
All content on this site is licensed under
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
If you see a mistake,
please select the word or sentence and press CTRL+ENTER