The organization did not complete the work under the municipal contract on time. After its expiration, the customer repeatedly demanded to fulfill the obligations under the contract. The organization asked to postpone the deadline. However, the work was not completed by the new date. Having refused to fulfill the contract, the customer applied to the control body for inclusion of the organization in the RNP.
UFAS did not post information about the organization in the RNP, because the customer refused to perform the contract when it was no longer valid. The courts supported the control body: civil law does not allow the termination of a contract that has expired. Therefore, the decision to refuse is legitimate.
The Supreme court annulled the acts of the Supervisory authority and the courts. To decide whether to include an organization in the RNP, you need to check:
whether it has not fulfilled (performed improperly) its obligations under the contract;
whether this violation was significant.
The end of the contract does not release the parties from responsibility for its violation and cannot be a reason not to include the performer in the RNP.
Document: Definition of the armed forces of the Russian Federation from 12.03.2020 N 308-ES19-23241