This requirement, including requesting information about beneficiaries, violates Law № 223. It doesn’t affect the performance of contractual obligations and does not confirm their proper implementation.
The method should be used by state customers, who purchase plastic medical products from the government list.
Since the moment of placement in the Uniform Information System of the procurement notice and before the conclusion of the contract, only the antimonopoly authority can verify the customer, stressed the departments.
Since September 9, new rules on liability under state contracts will begin to operate, and former ones will lose their force.
The charter of the participant may not have the kind of economic activity that corresponds to the object of procurement. In the opinion of the department, only because of the absence of this kind of activity in the statute can reject the application.
The approach is applicable if the initial maximum price of the contract was higher than 3 million rubles, and the participant of the electronic auction offered a lower price. This is the opinion of the Perm Administration of the Federal Antimonopoly Service.
The State Committee of the Republic of Tatarstan of Procurement, the Republican Agency of Press and Mass Communications «Tatmedia» and the State Unitary Enterprise of the Republic of Tatarstan «Center for Procurement Development of the Republic of Tatarstan» are holding a Republican contest for the best coverage in the mass media of the functioning of the contract system in the procurement of goods, works , services to ensure state and municipal needs.
The participant filed a complaint about the actions of the customer, but the antimonopoly service returned it because of missing the deadline. However, on the basis of the complaint, the state agency conducted an unscheduled audit of the customer. The order also indicated another basis for verification - the receipt of information on the violation of Law № 44.
The amendments concern FSBU and regional SBU, which participate in the program of state guarantees of free medical care.
It is not necessary to apply Law № 223 by the draft in the following cases: