The applicant complained to the antimonopoly authority about the procurement documentation under Law No. 223-FZ. However, he did not apply for participation in the procurement and did not seek clarification of the provisions of the documentation. The FAS management recognized the complaint as unfounded. The applicant challenged this decision in court.
The court decided that only those who applied for procurement could appeal against the provisions of the documentation. The rest can only complain about violations committed while posting information about the procurement, as well as the fact that the order of filing, organizing and conducting the procurement is not observed.
Document: Resolution of the Arbitration Court of the Volga-Vyatka District of 17.05.2018 on the case N A79-10042 / 2017