The Ministry told about the results of the working group meeting held on August 30 with the participation of representatives of authorized banks and operators of electronic platforms included in the relevant list (order of the Government of the Russian Federation of July 12, 2018 № 1447-p). Thus, it was confirmed the existence of cooperation agreements between all these operators of electronic platforms and banks.
In its letter, the Treasury of Russia reported on the need to provide participants of the contract system in the field of procurement, except for procurement participants, with certificates and electronic signatures from January 1, 2019 in the manner prescribed by the regulations of the certifying center of the Federal Treasury, approved by the order of the Federal Treasury of July 31, 2015 № 197
The participant specified in the Declaration as a part of the second part of the application that it meets the requirements of item 3-9 of part 1 of Art. 31 of the Law N 44-FZ. He also gave a more detailed justification on all points, except p. 7, 7.1 of part 1 of article 31 of the Law N 44-FZ. The Commission of the customer rejected the application, considering that the participant has not confirmed its compliance with these points.
The road enterprise in the absence of the contract signed with the state customer, performed works on elimination of consequences of the cyclone and on the maintenance of highways. The customer in the payment of the performed works the company refused. In this regard, the contractor appealed to the arbitration court to the customer to recover the cost of the work performed.
The company (hereinafter also – the contractor) and the institution (hereinafter – the customer) signed a state contract for the implementation of works on the construction of a kindergarten. The contractor, when signing the contract, was acquainted with the design and estimate documentation and had no comments increasing the contract price and terms of work.
The Supervisory authority picked up a practice where the court upheld his position. We list the main conclusions that should be followed in the preparation of documentation, consideration of applications of participants and the conclusion of the contract.
Additions to the rules on which the national regime is applied, prepared and submitted for public discussion by the Ministry of industry and trade.
The company, recognized as the winner of the electronic auction, sent to the customer a signed draft contract and a Bank guarantee as security for the contract.
Section of documentation on public procurement, which contained requirements for the product, took more than 200 pages. The indicators were presented in a different way, without a system.
The customer charged a penalty for the entire price of the contract from the first day of delay to the full execution of the contract. The supplier did not agree with this, since the customer received part of the goods long before the last batch, albeit with a delay. It went to the Supreme court.