The superior court has cancelled the interim measures taken by court of the first instance. They were that the customer was forbidden to send information connected with unilateral refusal of the contract to OFAS.
The law N 44-FL establishes not the right, but a duty of the customer to report in antimonopoly authority that the contract is terminated unilaterally. If information is authentic, it joins in the register of unfair suppliers. Therefore, interim measures have infringed public interests and interests of OFAS on performance of the duties assigned to him by the Law N 44-FL.
Besides, these measures aren't connected with a dispute subject. In case of satisfaction of the claim they don't provide performance of the judicial act. The similar opinion is expressed also by other courts.
Document: The resolution EXPERT of the Volga region district of 29.04.16 in the matter of N A55-26680/2015