Customer unilaterally terminated the contract with the supplier, despite the fact that the latter carried out its obligations. Inclusion of information about the supplier during the execution of the contract in the register of unfair suppliers was the reason for the dissolution. Supplier asked the court to cancel the decision to dissolution of a contract.
The court has satisfied his request. Article 95 of the Federal Law of 05.04.2013 N 44-FL provides that the unilateral termination of the contract by the customer only if the carelessly supplier, let him become a winner at the stage of purchase (pre-contract). This regulation does not cover the relations between the parties of the contract in the event of any circumstances during the period of its execution.
Supplier as is fully consistent won legally with the requirements established by the documentation, including no information about it in Register of unfair suppliers. Thus, the decision to unilaterally terminate the contract was taken by the customer in violation of the Federal Law of 05.04.2013 N 44-FL.