The state customer does not have the right to reject the application, in which it is proposed to deliver goods more than necessary
The customer rejected the application because the quantity of goods offered for delivery was greater in the auction document. The Antimonopoly Authority considered that there were no grounds for rejecting the application, and found the customer to have violated Law No. 44-FZ.
The court sided with the antimonopoly authority, pointing out that the rejection of the application does not conform to the objectives of the procurement activity and does not comply with the Law No. 44-FZ.
It is important that the customer's cassation appeal was refused to be submitted for consideration to the Judicial Collegium on Economic Disputes of the Supreme Court of Russian Federation
Document:
Resolution of the AC of the Urals District of 12.09.2017 in the case N A60-60007 / 2016