The Office of the Federal Antimonopoly Service decided that the subcontract does not confirm experience in public procurement of construction with additional requirements
The participant complained that he was not allowed to purchase. He submitted, among other things, a subcontract for civil works, but the Employer decided that such a contract was not suitable.
Controllers supported the customer. In construction procurement with additional requirements, experience is confirmed by a general contract. The subcontractor does not have the necessary qualifications, since it performs only part of the work. He does not participate in the commissioning and commissioning of the object, does not bear warranty obligations for it.
Similar conclusions were reached, in particular, by the Federal Antimonopoly Service and the Murmansk Department of the Federal Antimonopoly Service. Note that in practice there is another opinion.
Document: Decision of the Vladimir Department of the Federal Antimonopoly Service of Russia dated November 21, 2022 N 033/06/48-798/2022