The Federal Antimonopoly Service reminded: the position of additional requirements in public procurement is determined taking into account the project documentation
The procurement participant complained that the customer incorrectly set additional requirements. According to the project documentation, the overhaul should be performed on a linear object, but the customer chose a position for capital construction objects.
The inspectors found the complaint justified. The design documentation was developed for a linear object, therefore, work on its repair was purchased. The customer mistakenly established additional requirements for the position for capital construction objects.
In a similar situation, the Ryazan UFAS also found a violation in the actions of the customer. The design documentation was compiled for the capital construction facility, and additional requirements were set by position for the linear one.
Document: Decision of the Tatarstan Federal Antimonopoly Service of Russia dated 06/15/2022 in case No. 016/06/31917/2022