The relevance of the extract from the register in public procurement with the national regime is important not only at the time of application submission
The application of the procurement participant with a ban on the admission of foreign goods was recognized as not meeting the requirements of the documentation. He did not provide an extract from the register of Russian or Eurasian industrial products.
The participant did not agree with this, since he attached the extract.
The customer explained that when considering the second parts of the applications, he did not find an extract in the register.
The supervisors supported the customer. Despite the fact that the participant submitted an extract, by the time the second parts of the applications were considered, it was irrelevant. This is due to the fact that information about Russian goods is entered into the register on the basis of a conclusion confirming the production of industrial products in the Russian Federation. If its validity period has expired, the information is excluded from the registry. Therefore, the customer did not find the data. The application was legitimately recognized as not corresponding to the documentation.
Note that the data on the validity period of the conclusion can be found in the statement itself.
A similar position is taken, in particular, by the Orenburg UFAS.
Document:
The decision of the Ulyanovsk Federal Antimonopoly Service of Russia of 20.07.2021 in the case N 073/06/69-424/2021