The change in prices for construction materials saved the winner of the state procurement from the RNP
The winner of the purchase did not send the contract to the customer on time, so he was found to have evaded.
The winner explained that he did not send the contract for reasons beyond his control: the prices of construction materials for the work have increased, so he does not have the financial ability to fulfill his obligations. Failure to sign a contract is not an intentional act.
He confirmed this with copies of commercial offers with prices that were valid on the date of posting the purchase notice and on the date of signing the contract.
The supervisors did not reveal any unfair behavior and did not find any grounds for the RNP.
Document:
Decision of the Voronezh Federal Antimonopoly Service of Russia of 11.06.2021 N 036/10/104-595/2021