The winner did not sign the contract on time and did not provide its security. The customer recognized him as evading.
The controllers did not include the information in the RNP, because the winner:
did not fulfill his obligations on time, since the authorized person was on a business trip. In the supporting documents there are dates that fell during the signing of the contract;
signed a contract and provided collateral as soon as the opportunity arose;
informed the customer about the readiness to deliver the goods;
had a positive experience in the execution of similar contracts.
A similar position is taken, in particular, by the Arkhangelsk UFAS, Kirov UFAS, Ivanovo UFAS.
Document: The decision of the Yaroslavl Federal Antimonopoly Service of Russia of 13.01.2022 in the case N 05-03/271P-22(76-163)