The FAS must admit mistakes and post on its website information about significant decisions recognized by the court as illegal
The cassation agreed with the lower courts that the fragmentary - incomplete coverage on the FAS website of the progress of the cases considered contradicts the principles of ensuring access to information about the activities of state bodies and local self-government. If the regulator told about the detected violations and the adoption of the act, and then the court recognized it.
The cassation agreed with the lower courts that the fragmentary - incomplete coverage on the FAS website of the progress of the cases considered contradicts the principles of ensuring access to information about the activities of state bodies and local self-government.
If the regulator told about the detected violations and the adoption of the act, and then the court declared this decision illegal and canceled, then this should also be reported on the website, follows from the decision of the Arbitration Court of the Volga District.
"Fragmentary coverage of the results of antimonopoly cases by the Federal Antimonopoly Service is unacceptable," the experts of the Competition and Law journal noted.
Document: Resolution of the Arbitration Court of the Volga District dated 02.12.2021 in case no. A12-2627/2021